Assalam Alikom
Excuse me at first that i wreit in english(mybe bad english) but belive me i cant wriet in arabic caus my PC, thank you to understand that.
Firstly, i would like thank Mister for returning to us an honor distinguished by his participation
in our site, which is relatively new certainly, but authentic as for his noble finality
dear Mister ADDAYINE,
In popular fight for imposed on the government the popular will with the change of the
electoral law (Nabiha Kamsse), nobody cannot deny that all the forces policy joined to make
.pass the new law
For me nothing is astonishing, since Kuwait was divided into two: or with the government and
.against the desired law or then against the government but with the new law
Nevertheless, after the vote of the desired law, I noticed a phenomenon which I can qualify
.unhealthy
.I notice a discrete harmony between the Moslem brothers (ALIKWAN) and the liberals
.I notice that the ideological confrontation by the press grows blurred for the moment
I notice that some of the liberal writers and theorists express an opinion agreeing with the
Moslem brothers hang the last war of libanon, whereas such an opinion is completely strange
.with their ideology
I notice that certain the most convinced liberals start to "soften his pen" against the Moslem
.brothers
The same remark as for the Moslem brothers, they start to modify ther discourses to them,
.so that it is closer to at least for ATTAJAMUO ASHABI
:Thus my questions, if you allow it to me, dear Mister, are as follows
My first question:
Are my remarks right, I want to say, is an unavowable wish at one as at
the other to be close as only just an simple strategic? More especially as the next election
will not be any more like the preceding ones, and I think that it will require a great popular
.mobilization to gain the seat at the Parliament
My second question:
So if it is really there will be an implicit wish of bringing together, that would not be criticizable
for the evolution of our young democracy ? I want to say that there will be a risk probable to
muddle the electoral process, and consequently the voter will not be able any more to
?distinguish between the two ideologies
I thank you, dear Sir, to have returned the honor by your visit to us, and especially to have
answered our question. I present to you all my excuse to have been prolix in my question,
and especially with bad English, but believe me dear Mister that I did all what i can to make it
.comprehensible
.